But what happens when we put our freedom at the hands of our ruler, the one that governs us. Your independent right was left to the right of voting.. In the end the voice of majority wins…leaving the minority to another level of frustration and agony… Well then, is the Independent person is not supposing have the freedom in thinking, freedom in expressing oneself? What ever happen to our birth rights?
"And if you want freedom, what is freedom without responsibility?.. Freedom without responsibility is anarchy?” quoted from a very famous leader of quite of a famous country.
Anarchists are those who believe that all people are imbued with a sort of commonality, common sense, that would allow for people to, in the absence of the government, come together in agreement to form a functional existence. Morality falls in line with functionality, and its forms differ. Anarchy does not reject ethics, or principles, but rather imposed morality.
For individualist anarchists, "the system of democracy, of majority decision, is held null and void. Any impingement upon the natural rights of the person is unjust and a symbol of majority tyranny." Its an assembly rather than democracy. The argument now is that existing democratic governments are justified by majority consent.
Again majority. Could there be once that the majority realise that they might be voting for the wrong decision?
0 comments:
Post a Comment